logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2015.04.29 2015고단219
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 23:50 on February 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the Msan-dong Police Station D police box located in Msan-si, Msan-si, Msan-si; (b) at the expense of a taxi engineer boarding the previous defendant as a guest, the Defendant continued to go within the said police box, which he had been loaded in the said police box at his own expense; (c) while taking a bath, such as cream, etc., he was under the influence of a taxi article, and the Defendant was frighting a disturbance while carrying out a riot, he was under the influence of the police box, and demanded confirmation of the circumstances where E was under the control of the defendant, who was under the control of the situation, was able to look for and confirm the identity of the defendant; and (d) the Defendant expressed his desire to “I do not have any name to stick, and there is no resident registration number.” (c) The Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police box, which is a police officer, by assaulting the face of E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of E prepared by the police;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the field pictures attached to investigation reports (only with respect to the attachment of CCTV photographs);

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine (the defendant shall be selected by taking into account the following factors: (a) the defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of injury at the Changwon District Court Msan Branch Branch on September 11, 2013; and (b) on May 7, 2014, which became final and conclusive on May 7, 2014; and (c) the crime of this case is not likely to be committed; (b) however, the defendant is in profoundly against his/her mistake; (c) the fact that he/she has agreed with the defendant; (d)

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant and his defense counsel had a state of mental disability under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime.

However, according to the above evidence, the defendant's drinking at the time of the crime of this case is true.

arrow