logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.12.16 2015고단6118
상습특수절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The "2015 Highest 6118" [Attachment 2015 Highest 6122] The defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor at the Incheon District Court on January 9, 1996, and one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny; on September 3, 1996, Incheon District Court sentenced ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for attempted larceny; on May 19, 1998, Incheon District Court sentenced one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny; on September 7, 2000, one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny; on May 31, 2002, the Seoul District Court sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny); on February 5, 2004, Incheon District Court sentenced three years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Theft; and on July 1, 2007, Incheon District Court sentenced one to imprisonment with prison labor for robbery, etc.

【Criminal Facts】

On June 23, 2015, at around 01:20 on June 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) laid down bricks in front of the Emi-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu operation of the Victim D in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; (b) broken off the entrance glass; and (c) intruded into the beauty room, which took the role of the corrective device, and then stolen 30,000 won in cash in the Karogate.

In addition, the Defendant habitually stolen property worth KRW 1,522,00 in total by destroying and destroying the entrance of others at night, such as a total of 13 times, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 1,522,00, and by intrusioning through the window which has been invaded or opened at night. However, even though the Defendant attempted to steals property through the same method over 10 times in total, it did not constitute an attempted crime due to the absence of stolen objects or the shock of an emergency bell.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to F and G;

1. Each written statement of H, I, D, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, Q, S, T, U,V, W, and X;

1. The records of seizure and the list of seizure;

arrow