The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Acceptance of property in breach of trust from R;

A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, on October 1980, issued a written complaint for a joint business trip in the Gyeongnam-nam branch, and thereafter transferred from January 1, 1986 to U and served as the head of V raw material factory production division. After U was changed to W, X, and S (hereinafter “S”), he served as the head of the procurement bureau, the head of the management innovation bureau, the head of the business support group, the head of the raw material business group, etc.

Since then, the Defendant served as the head of Seoul Metropolitan Government headquarters, the head of the marketing headquarters, and the head of the overseas business headquarters. From March 2006 to February 201, the Defendant served as the head of the production department. A person who had jurisdiction over all departments in S while working as the president from February 2, 2010 to July 2015 and has been in charge of direction and supervision of all matters related to duties, and final personnel affairs for employees.

at the residence of the Defendant in Tae-gu Daejeon Special Metropolitan City(102) from October 2009 to November 21, 2009, who worked as S production sector, and under the S production sector(s).

In February 2010, the AI manufacture R received KRW 40 million in terms of personnel solicitation, such as transfer and promotion to a position that was desired to be an executive officer position when he/she was around February 2010.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired the property of KRW 40 million in return for an illegal solicitation in relation to his duties as a person who administers another's business.

B. In a case where the issue is whether the pertinent legal principles were given or not, the Defendant’s statement that was identified as the recipient of the money and valuables denies the receipt of the money and, in the absence of objective evidence, such as financial data to support this, there should be not only the admissibility of evidence, but also the credibility of the statement to exclude reasonable doubt. When determining credibility, the credibility of the statement itself is not only the rationality, objective reasonableness, and consistency before and after, but also its human nature.