logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.04.19 2017고단150
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, at the Defendant’s home located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the Internet portal site, and the Internet portal site, “C” bulletin board of the “C”, referred to as “D”, “E”, refers to the victim F who operates the online shopping mall of the Gu, and “G”, and the Defendant complained against the appeal and the appeal and the appeal and the appeal and the appeal are made only for the appraisal of the Gu Section 1.

In this paper, I think that it was difficult to understand why it was tax evasion.

긔 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ’ 라는 글을 게시하여 마치 피해 자가 쇼핑몰을 운영하며 탈세를 하였다는 취지의 허위의 글을 게시하였다.

The Defendant, with the aim of slandering such information, posted a false fact openly through an information and communications network, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim.

2. Determination and conclusion

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 70 (3) of the above Act;

C. On January 10, 2017, the agent of the victim submitted an application for withdrawal of a complaint and non-compliance with punishment.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow