Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인은 2016. 5. 12. 10:59 경 서울 도봉구 B에 있는 피고인의 주거지에서 인터넷 네이버 ‘C ’에 ’D’ 이라는 아이디로 접속하여 피해자 E이 ‘F ’라고 작성해 놓은 게시 글에 “ 병신새끼 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 수작 부리거나 보빨하는 건 아닌데 남친 있는 여자는 싫다

ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 단언 컨대

In this context, there is no person who will do so, so we can do so in the house.

ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ” 라는 댓 글을 게재하였다.

2. On May 12, 2016, at the same place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1 at around 11:10 on May 12, 2016, the Defendant, in the same manner as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1, i.e., “g., a woman’s Montreal superior who has a visual string straw, shall be extracted from drinking water on the eye of the string string of fluor.

Along with this, the author inserted comments on “Woman”.

3. On May 12, 2016, at the same place, the Defendant posted a statement on the same manner as described in the foregoing paragraph 1 at the same time, stating that “Pho-gu, such as Gwangju, is a riot, and Gwangju, even if Gwangju, he/she desires to drink,” in the same manner as described in the foregoing paragraph 1.

4. 피고인은 2016. 5. 12. 11:19 경 같은 장소에서 위 1 항 기재와 같은 방법으로 “ 응 너 같은 새끼들을 말하는 거야 ^^ 광주새끼 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 댓 글쓸 가치가 없다 광주새끼 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 가서 느그 어미한테 사 까시나 해 달라고 해 ^^ 저런 새끼가 실제로 만나면 무릎 꿇고 잘못했어요~

I see only once, write the comments " ............................................

Accordingly, the Defendant openly insulting the victim by inserting comments on comments four times in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on closure data on comments;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act (including inclusive) of the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment;