(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.12.18 2015구단77

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.12.18 2015구단77

장애등급외결정 취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 1, 2012, while repairing a window through a house, the Plaintiff was suffering from an accident that was treated as a part of the part of the Plaintiff’s grandchildren, due to the shock of the part of the Plaintiff’s grandchildren, due to the shocking of the part of the Plaintiff’s grandchildren, for which treatment was provided to the instant part of the right finger, and thereby, the scope of the exercise of the part of the right finger was reduced by at least 50%, and at least 3, 4, and 50%, the exercise scope of the part of the right finger was reduced by at least 75%. On March 27, 2014, the Plaintiff applied for disability ratings against the Defendant.

B. On June 19, 2014, the Defendant, following an examination by the National Pension Management Corporation, rendered a decision that the Plaintiff’s right-hand fingers or 3,4, and 5 resin does not constitute a disability grade but does not constitute a physical restriction opinion, and notified the Plaintiff of this decision.

C. The Plaintiff filed an objection against the Defendant, but was dismissed on October 6, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] The entry of Gap evidence No. 3 and the purport of the whole argument

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is unlawful in the instant disposition that did not recognize the disability rating for the Plaintiff, despite the disability diagnosis that the exercise scope of Section 3, 4, and 5 balance of the right-hand 3, 4, and 5 balance was reduced by not less than 75%, and the Plaintiff was diagnosed to have a strong understanding of not more than 1/5 of normal conditions because the Plaintiff’s physical strength was significantly deteriorated due to the right-hand emergal macy, and was diagnosed to have a strong understanding of not more than 1/5 of normal conditions.

B. According to the results of physical appraisal of the Plaintiff’s assertion and diagnosis due to the foregoing accident, and the Plaintiff’s 3, 4, and 5’s active exercise range of 75% or more of the right side of the Plaintiff’s 3, 4, and 5.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2020.07.10 2016구단1794

-울산지방법원 2021.04.15 2019구합983

-대전지방법원 2017.01.19 2016구단100418

-광주지방법원 2019.03.14 2018구단657

-청주지방법원 2021.04.08 2019구합1024