1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

Judgment of the first instance.

The court's explanation of this case is as stated in Paragraph 2 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the dismissal or addition of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or additional parts] The 4th page 16 of the 4th page is added to “the testimony of the J of the Political Party Witness.”

The 5th and 5th of the 5th, “the Defendant was dryed on the part of the Defendant, but he was not negligent in the registration of transfer from the vehicle transaction, but the J lost the above responsible insurance policy, which is the document required for the above registration of transfer, while neglecting the registration of transfer from the vehicle transaction, and the J, around January 3, 2013, requested A to re-issue a responsible insurance policy on around March 2013 to complete the registration of transfer from the vehicle of this case, but requested A to receive it from A.”

Following the fifth and seventh points, “A” is added to “A” (it is difficult to believe in light of the testimony of the witness of the trial court) to the effect that it requested the transfer registration of the instant vehicle twice or twice and that J would immediately allow the transfer registration.”

After the fifth 8th 201, J, who was an employee of the Defendant, added “other than the fact that J, around March 2013, notified A of the expiration of the term of validity of the instant vehicle inspection and thus, caused the vehicle inspection.”

Following the 5th page 13’s “The circumstances” added the phrase “where a motor vehicle dealer sells a motor vehicle, he/she shall file an application for registration of transfer on behalf of a buyer (Article 12(2) of the Motor Vehicle Management Act), and may be subject to administrative disposition and criminal punishment in case of violation.”

Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is out of the judgment of the court of first instance.