The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. 이 사건 공소사실 피고인은 2019. 1. 7. 08:35경 서울 동작구에 있는 사당역을 출발하여 교대 방향으로 운행 중인 전동차 안에서 치마를 입은 채 출입문 근처에 서있던 피해자 B(가명, 여, 28세)의 뒤쪽에서 피해자의 다리 사이로 손을 넣고 손가락을 움직여 양 허벅지 안쪽을 톡톡 치고, 위 전동차가 방배역을 지날 무렵 피해자의 다리 사이로 손을 넣고 손가락 마디 부분을 위아래로 움직여 피해자의 허벅지 안쪽을 쓰다듬었다.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim in a concentrated means of public transportation.

2. In a judgment of conviction in a criminal trial, the conviction ought to be based on evidence of probative value, which leads to a judge to have a conviction that is beyond a reasonable doubt, to the extent that the facts charged are true. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the doubt of guilt against the defendant should be disregarded.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim's statement about the situation and the defendant's attitude at the time of damage is in conflict with the specific and consistent manner, and there is a doubtful point such as entertainment, etc.

However, the following facts and circumstances are acknowledged from the evidence, and in full view of this, it is difficult to exclude reasonable doubt as to the facts charged that the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim.

① At the time, the victim was knee-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de

(2) The hours of indecent conduct against a scarcity shall be from the time to the time when the victim arrives in the Seocho Station.