A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 8, 2017, the Defendant does not enter the toilet in the dwelling of the Defendant, No. 1004 of the 1004 building B in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Seoul-si, and the Defendant does not leave the toilet.

“A” means that D, a police officer belonging to the Suwon Police Station C District of the Suwon Police Station, called upon Defendant 112, tried to open the toilet door in order to open with fire fighters, thereby pushing D with his hand, and subsequently D to make D save with the Defendant, and to file a petition with D sama, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, and E, the head of the State.

“Absing to display D’s hand with D’s hand, and attempted to display D’s hand, thereby obstructing police officers’ legitimate performance of duties in relation to the handling of reported cases, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Investigative reports (to hear statements by the F phone of a witness), recording, reporting, and recording;

1. On-site video CDs, including arrest;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the place of emergency medical services activities;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Social Service Order have been the same type of crime, and the Defendant was subject to a fine of three million won in 2013. In addition, even though he was given a fine of five times due to a violent crime, he again committed the instant crime even though he had sufficient opportunity to be aware of his violent tendency under the influence of alcohol. The Defendant interfered with the rescue activities of fire officers under the influence of alcohol and thereby, thereby undermining the Defendant’s wife’s location’s concealment, thereby impairing the public power over the enforcement of the Act.

The Defendant, rather than against the instant crime, has been treated unfairly by the police before, is urgent to justify his behavior.

(b).