logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2011.09.02 2011고정1127
모욕등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인은 2010. 10. 27. 23:10경 성남시 수정구 C 음식점에서 피고인이 행패를 부린다는 신고를 받고 출동한 D지구대 순경 E에게 별다른 이유없이 F 등 10여명이 있는 자리에서 "야 십새끼들아 난 너희만 보면 밥맛이다" "개새끼들아 왜 왔냐"라고 말하여 공연히 모욕하였다.

2. At around 00:20 on October 28, 2010, the Defendant insulting E, as seen above, arrested the Defendant as an offender in the act of committing a crime, and subsequently, arrested the Defendant. In the D District District, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate duties, such as: (a) taking the face of the D District G slope of the D District where the Defendant took a bath for about 50 minutes; and (b) taking the face of the D District G slope where the Defendant chilled him/her drinking at one time; and (c) taking the face of the D District G, he/she took care of him/her at one time, and causing injury that requires treatment for 7 days on the right side of the upper right side of the autopsy,

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G, E, and F;

1. The legal statement of the witness H in part;

1. Results of this Court from the verification of CCTV screen CDs;

1. A written statement prepared in the I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning photographs and investigative reports (CCTV image data);

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of insult and the choice of fine) of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the aggravation of concurrent crimes as provided for in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (Provided, That the aggravated punishment shall be limited to the sum of maximum amounts of the crimes above) shall be applicable;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more of the cost of lawsuit;

arrow