beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 113,585,840 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from September 26, 2013 to April 30, 2014.
Reasons
1. The following facts may be acknowledged if there is no dispute between the parties, or if the purport of the entire pleadings is added to each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 44 (including paper numbers).
The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with B, which includes “other vehicle driving security” with respect to C Passenger Vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”).
B. On November 1, 2010, Plaintiff B, a driver of an urban bus, called the Defendant at a beer house located in the workplace and Dong-si, and called the Defendant to the Defendant, who was the recipient, after drinking alcoholic beverages at the beer house located in the Gu-si and Gu-si.
The Defendant moved to B with his own vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”) and, at the first time, had the Defendant drive the vehicle on the night road, but the Defendant did so to B, who was able to drive the vehicle on the night road rather than himself.
C. Therefore, around 03:00 on November 1, 2010, B driven the Defendant’s vehicle with a blood alcohol content of 0.128%, and caused an accident where the driver and the passenger of the Oral Ba, a driver and the passenger of Oral Ba, who had been directly in line with normal signal, suffered from the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the 359 driver’s intersection in front of the 359 intersection of the Doc-si, the front part of the Doc-si in front of the Doc-si (hereinafter “instant accident”). The accident occurred, where the driver and the passenger of Oral Ba, who had been in line with normal signal from the Doc-si’s boundary of the Doc-si, went into the front part of the Doc-si, in front of the Doc-si (hereinafter “instant accident”).
A passenger E suffers from the instant accident, namely, three degrees of visual images, stowings, and stokes, of the two sides and both sides, as well as 25 per cent of the upper stokes, such as the total number of both sides, etc., the driver D suffers from 15 per cent of the upper stokes, such as the upper stokes, and the upper stokes F.
E. The Plaintiff, as an insurer of B, is KRW 124,50,824 to E by September 25, 2013, and KRW 212,138,155 to D, and KRW 41,930 to F.