A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. From September 8, 2020 to 20:40 on the same day, the Defendant who interfered with the business may not continue to spread away from the value of the goods, to the point of “D” in the operation of the victim C in the Michuhol-gu Incheon Metropolitan City B market between September 8, 202 and September 20:40.

“A person who conducts funeral services in such manner” shall not engage in any defect, “as such,”

In the future, funeral services will be suspended.

approximately 12 minutes have been avoided, such as "packing franc trees".

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

2. The Defendant interfering with the performance of official duties was reported at the date, time, place, and place specified in paragraph 1 and demanded that the Defendant be dispatched to the site and returned home, and that the Defendant be called to the field and returned home. The Defendant “I am to the field, Nar police.”

Hamba, Hamba, Hamba, Hamba Hamba Ham, Hamba Ham, the police Hamba Hamba Hamba Hamba Ham, Fhn Hamba Ham Ham, Fhn Lba Ham Hamb

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the police concerning F of the defendant's partial statement in court;

1. Application of each written statement in C and G-form statutes in the United States Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution ( comprehensively considering favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant substituted for a crime, the fact that the degree of power and the exercise of tangible power is relatively minor);