Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 6, 2017, around 21:30, the Defendant: (a) in front of the “C” door located in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on the street; (b) the Defendant received a report from 112 that he was under the influence of alcohol and received a recommendation for returning home from the victim D, a police official called the police officer dispatched to that place; (c) while the reporter E et al. hear, the Defendant was the victim, “I am feas, and I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am the public authority.”

The term “assumed” refers to several times.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the same time and place as set forth in the above Paragraph 1 of the same Article, and the police officer of the F District of the Seoul Gwanak Police Station, who was called out after receiving a report 112, took a cell phone inquiry room of the police officer D, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties over about 20 minutes by assaulting G, such as taking a cell phone questioning room of the police officer D while taking a bath to G while taking a bath to G, cutting off G’s arms and cutting off the cell phone, cutting off the cell phone steering session used by G, and displaying the cell phone steering session.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to G or D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (to the extent that the amount is aggregated) shall be aggravated for concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) of the Criminal Procedure Act was that the defendant took a bath or assault against a police officer who performs legitimate business, and the nature of the crime is not good.

However, all kinds of sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's confession of the crime of this case and the mistake is divided, the fact that the defendant is the first offender who has no record of the crime, and the age, sex, environment, family relationship, means and result of the crime, etc.