Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years and for two years and six months, respectively.

(2) from the date of this judgment;

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not interfere with the defendants' exercise of their right to defense, part of the facts charged was appropriately revised based on each written protocol of interrogation of each prosecutor's office against the defendants and written statement of the police against C.

1. The Defendants, who suffered injury by robbery, enticed men who want to be able to get South of conditions as well as D (in addition, 14 years of age) with the post-ship of middle school, and attempted sexual traffic to minors as a weak point, and attempted sexual traffic to threaten them, and gather money and valuables by using violence, and divided them into a seed.

On July 27, 2019, at around 23:00, the Defendants and D had a room of Fheading in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon. Defendant A and D had access to the mobile phone clock “G” to find the victim C (Nam, South and 41 years old) on July 28, 2019 while finding the subject of crime, and sent D’s photograph and enticed the victim into Embel as they had engaged in sexual traffic.

D around 02:00 on the same day, the victim met or enters the victim and H at the Eel underground parking lot, and then the defendant was informed of the number of the guest room to the defendant A.

On July 28, 2019, the Defendants entered the above H No. 02:10 on July 28, 2019, and Defendant A stated that the victim “I will come to the seat of a minor who will go to the seat of the branch,” and that D would go out of the guest room, and Defendant B got out of the guest room, and the victim could not escape because the entrance door was obstructed by the cremation room.

Then, Defendant B got off the victim’s mobile phone and did not inform the victim of the password, but Defendant A found two scams and passwords of the victim, and took photographs of contact numbers of other persons stored in the victim’s mobile phone using the victim’s mobile phone from Defendant B with the victim’s cell phone, and Defendant B said that “the victim was scamed at the victim’s cell phone,” and said, Defendant B said that “the victim was scamed.”