The crime No. 1 of the judgment of punishment against the defendant, No. 4 of the judgment, and the crime No. 1 and No. 2 of the attached list of crimes.

Punishment of the crime

On February 11, 2014, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one-year imprisonment with prison labor at the Gwangju District Court for fraud, etc. and three years for the same year.

2. The above judgment became final and conclusive on 19.

1. The criminal defendant against the victim D had no intention or ability to give Internet lectures to his/her children even if he/she received tuition fees from the victim D.

Nevertheless, on February 11, 2009, the Defendant concluded a video lecture contract with the victim and settled the amount of KRW 2,534,400 as tuition fees with the victim, on the part of the victim D’s house located in Sungsung-gun E, around February 11, 2009, stating that “The victim would give his children attending the third grade of the math grade of the math grade of the math grade of the school at each week of the math grade of the week,” and that the victim entered into a video lecture contract with the victim.

Then, on March 3, 2009, the defendant can make a discount if he makes payment to the victim by the BC card at the home of the above victim.

If it is said that the BC card would be settled at a discounted price after cancelling the details that had been settled with the LG card prior to the commencement of the LG card, and it would be paid at a discounted price. Accordingly, the details of the payment by the LG card existing have not been revoked after obtaining the BC card from the victim and paying the amount of 2,865,600 won as tuition fees.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 5,400,000 in total (the second half of 4496). On September 4, 2014, the Defendant concluded a video education program contract with the victim F located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, for the victim’s residence, and concluded a video education program contract with the victim on the victim’s Korean language, English, academic, social, and scientific five subjects, thereby making it false for the victim to pay the victim the cost of lectures and teaching materials for five years a week.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party as above, he did not have the intent or ability to give the injured party's children a video lecture.