logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.31 2017가합546892
부정경쟁행위 금지 및 손해배상 청구
Text

1. The defendant,

(a) manufacture, sale, transfer, display, import, and import of each product listed in paragraphs 1 to 3 of Schedule 2;

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, a company engaged in the business of producing, selling, and importing furnitures, and each of the waves listed in the [Attachment 1] list (hereinafter “instant so-called so-called the instant so-off”) is manufacturing, selling, and posting the so-called so-called so-called the so-called “instant pictures”) on the Internet shopping mall (htp://www.Cga.com”) operated by the Plaintiff, by posting the so-called so-called the so-called so-called “instant pictures” in the attached Table 3 list and each of the images recorded in the attached Table (hereinafter “instant pictures”).

B. The Defendant posted each small wave listed in the attached Table 2 (hereinafter “Defendant small wave”) in the Internet shopping mall operated by the Defendant (htp:/sglo.co.C.r/), and posted each picture recorded in the “Defendant” column in the attached Table 4 in the attached Table 4 (hereinafter “Defendant photograph”) on the shopping mall.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-6, 16-19, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's ground for claim

A. Article 2 subparag. 1(i) of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (hereinafter “Unfair Competition Prevention Act”) was copied in the form of a product, which is defined as an unfair competition act, by selling each small strike listed in [Attachment 1, 2, and 3] of [Attachment 1] among the small strike in this case, in which the form of the small strike listed in [Attachment 1] No. 1, 2, and 3 of [Attachment 2] was identical (the Plaintiff withdrawn this part of the claim regarding the small strike listed in Annex 2] from the preparatory document dated March 7, 2018 as stated on June 8, 2018.

(2) In addition, the Defendant’s selling of the same type of the Plaintiff’s so-called the Plaintiff’s so-called the Plaintiff’s so-called “pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-pro-con”)

arrow