A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 17, 2020, the Defendant reported on May 17, 2020, “C” in front of “C,” and “C”, but, on the ground that the police officer’s measures taken by the Defendant were not attributable to mind, sent the Defendant’s cell phone E, which was cited in the Defendant’s hand on two occasions, sent the Defendant’s cell phone blick with “Y Hah Hah Hahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties related to the 112 Reporting Case Handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on statements;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One to five years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] of the obstruction of performance of official duties: [Type 1] No person shall be subject to the obstruction of performance of official duties or coercion of official duties [the scope of recommended areas and recommendations] (the scope of recommended areas and recommendations] basic area, six months to one year and six months.

3. Determination of sentence: The sentence shall be determined as per the order, taking into consideration all the circumstances including six months of imprisonment, the course of the crime in this case for one year of probation and the degree of violence, the previous criminal record of the defendant, the fact that the defendant is against the obligation of the defendant;