logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.09.04 2014가합72572
건물명도
Text

1. The Plaintiff, Defendant A, and Defendant B, are listed in attached Table 1’s Schedule 1’s real estate, and Defendant B, respectively.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant A, B, C, D, E, F, H, and I

(a) an indication of the reasons for the claim as shown in Appendix 2;

(However) However, the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached list shall be the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached list; the real estate listed in paragraph (2) of the attached list shall be the real estate listed in paragraph (2) of the attached list; the real estate listed in paragraph (8) of the attached list shall be the real estate listed in paragraph (3) of the attached list 1; the real estate listed in paragraph (4) of the attached list shall be the real estate listed in paragraph (4) of the attached list 1; the real estate listed in paragraph (5) of the attached list shall be the real estate listed in paragraph (5) of the attached list; the real estate listed in paragraph (16) of the attached list shall be the real estate listed in paragraph (8) of the attached list 1; the real estate listed in paragraph (18) of the attached

Articles 208(3)2, 150(3), and 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts (Judgment by deeming that the application is made);

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant G

A. On August 30, 201, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant G on KRW 21,050,000, monthly rent of KRW 212,800 with respect to the real estate listed in attached Table 1 List 7, and the said Defendant delayed payment of KRW 2,625,600, monthly rent of KRW 12 months as of November 201.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 17 and 2-17 of the evidence Nos. 17 and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts, since the above defendant failed to pay the rent under the above lease contract, the above lease contract was lawfully terminated by the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case stating the plaintiff's declaration of intent to terminate the above lease contract on the grounds of the above defendant's failure to pay the rent.

Therefore, the above defendant is obligated to order the plaintiff to clarify the real estate stated in attached Table 1 List 7.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so ordered as per Disposition.

arrow