logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.11.20 2015가합62725
건물명도
Text

1. The defendants order each of the pertinent buildings listed in the separate sheet No. 1 list to the plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

Reasons

1. Determination as to claims against Defendant B, C, D, F, G, H, and I

(a) an indication of the reasons for the claim as shown in Appendix 2;

(However, the building listed in paragraph (3) of the attached list shall be the building listed in paragraph (2) of the attached list; the building listed in paragraph (4) of the attached list shall be the building listed in paragraph (3) of the attached list; the building listed in paragraph (6) of the attached list shall be the building listed in paragraph (4) of the attached list 1; the building listed in paragraph (9) of the attached list shall be the building listed in paragraph (6) of the attached list 1; the building listed in paragraph (11) of the attached list shall be the building listed in paragraph (7) of the attached list; the building listed in paragraph (13) of the attached list shall be the building listed in paragraph (8) of the attached list 1; and

Defendant B, D, F, G, H, and I of the applicable provisions of law: Article 208(3)2, Article 150(3), and Article 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act (a) of the Act on Procedure: Defendant C: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (a judgment by service by public notice)

2. The facts as to the claim against the defendant A and E do not conflict between the parties (However, the buildings listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table shall be deemed the buildings listed in Paragraph (1) of the attached Table 1, and the buildings listed in Paragraph (8) of the attached Table shall be deemed the buildings listed in Paragraph (5) of the attached Table 1), and the above defendants have the obligation to order the plaintiff to issue each pertinent building listed in the attached Table 1 list

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow