1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added in the trial are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 1, 2003, the Plaintiff was newly appointed as a special teacher at H elementary school. On March 1, 2006, the Plaintiff was transferred to a special teacher at I elementary school on March 1, 2006, and was transferred to a special teacher at B elementary school on March 1, 2007.

B. From June 14, 2009 to June 13, 2010, the Plaintiff temporarily retired from office on the grounds of depression for one year. From June 14, 2010 to June 13, 201, the Plaintiff used annual leave on the grounds of traffic accidents for 12 days from June 14, 2010, and thereafter made a temporary retirement from office on the grounds of a traffic accident for nine months from June 26, 201 to March 25, 201, and thereafter extended the period by three months (from March 26, 2011 to June 25, 201).

After May 26, 2011, the Plaintiff submitted the restoration to the original state due to the expiration of the period of temporary retirement and the extinguishment of the grounds for temporary retirement, and the Defendant appointed the Plaintiff from the temporary retirement of disease on June 26, 201.

C. From June 10, 201 to August 5, 2011, the Plaintiff filed an application for sick leave by computerized or mail for a total of 10 occasions on the grounds of 10 occasions, such as thirrosis and salivosis (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant sick leave”). The B Elementary School Chairperson continued to return the application on the grounds that the Plaintiff had already been employed on the ground that it is the same disease as the reason for the Plaintiff’s temporary retirement. In other words, the Plaintiff was sent by telephone, text message, and content-certified mail for immediate reinstatement, and the Plaintiff did not continue to work.

On October 10, 201, the Defendant issued a disposition to dismiss the Plaintiff as of October 11, 201 pursuant to Article 78(1)1 of the State Public Officials Act on the ground that the Plaintiff was absent from office without permission for 46 days from June 26, 2011 to August 23, 2011 and violated Articles 56, 57, and 58 of the State Public Officials Act.

E. On July 18, 2012, the Plaintiff appealed and filed a petition review on the instant disposition with the Appeal Commission for Teachers, but was dismissed on August 27, 2012 on the ground that the period for request expires.

【Ground of recognition” without any dispute, Gap 3, 4, 5, Eul 1, 8, 12, 15, 16, 17, 21 respectively.