logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.09.30 2016나2293
사업계획변경신청절차이행
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is the same as the part of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following in the fifth and sixth part of the judgment of the court of first instance (which requires revocation). Thus, this court's explanation of this case is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Article 16 (12) of the Housing Act provides that "Third, Article 16 (12) of the Housing Act shall apply to cases where a business entity loses ownership of a site due to auction, public auction, etc., and (4) The plaintiff shall accept the plaintiff's claim for a new construction of a small apartment by modifying the design if the approval of the change in this case is revoked on the third date for pleading of the trial court." The judgment of the court of first instance is justified as the conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is

arrow