logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.03.21 2012고단3265
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the prosecution against the charge of assault and intimidation is against each other.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On August 4, 2006, the Defendant of criminal records was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a period of one year and six months in the Seoul Eastern District Court on the grounds of indecent act by force, attack, etc., and on July 25, 2007, the said suspended sentence was invalidated by a final judgment on October 11, 2007, which became final and conclusive at the same court on October 29, 2009. On September 23, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and two months in the original prison on September 23, 2010.

2. Criminal facts;

A. From October 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 20:0 in the middle of 20:0, the Defendant: (b) collected a food knife in the instant restaurant operated by the victim D (V, 58 years of age) of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (c) carried a food knife in the instant restaurant with a female customer, without any justifiable reason, while drunkly drinking; (d) posted the knife in the instant restaurant; and (e) displayed the knife on the knife, the female customer was drinking; and (e) displayed the knife the knife in the instant restaurant, and obstructed the Defendant’s restaurant business by force for 20 minutes, including the Defendant’s display of male customers and preventing them from doing business. (b) On November 17, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant’s restaurant’s restaurant business by force.

3. On December 5, 2012, at around 19:00, the Defendant: (a) moved female guests who drink alcohol while drinking in the above “E” restaurant; (b) obtained drinking while drinking eggs; (c) made female guests dissurcing a restaurant, thereby obstructing the victim D’s restaurant business by force.

B. A thief Defendant is a victim who was in a restaurant with the victim D while being drunk in the above “E” restaurant around 20:30 on November 2012, 201, using the gap where surveillance was neglected.

arrow