(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2015.08.17 2015고단454

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2015.08.17 2015고단454

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 9, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at a credit branch of the Suwon District Court. On May 13, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to 2 months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Suwon District Court on August 24, 2009 and completed the execution of the final sentence at the Suwon District Court on August 24, 2009.

"2015 Highest 454"

1. On April 4, 201, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim “I will work as an employee from Eda to work. I will lend clothes, etc. to 500,000 won to the victim,” and on April 5, 2011, the defendant made a false statement to the victim “I will continue to pay money to the victim in advance, so I will work as a multi-faced employee if I will pay money to the victim.”

However, in the course of operating the FC in the past, the Defendant had an intention to use a debt equivalent to KRW 31 million borrowed from the bond company and borrowed money from the victim to repay the above bonds, etc. The Defendant had no intention to work as an employee from the victim's multiples, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money from the victim.

On April 4, 2011, the Defendant received KRW 500,000 from the victim as a loan, and received KRW 500,000 from the victim on April 5, 201. On April 5, 2011, the Defendant transferred KRW 3 million to the account of community credit cooperatives under the name of the Defendant and acquired it by fraud.

2. On June 1, 2011, the criminal defendant against the victim G made a false statement to the victim “I want to work as a multiple employee, so I want to work as a multiple employee, from June 3, 2011 to June 3, 201.”

However, as stated in Paragraph 1, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay prepaid money properly.

The defendant is under the name of the defendant in the name of 3,50,000 won as a prepaid payment from the victim.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2013.04.25 2012고단7700

-대구지방법원 2014.05.01 2013고단4391

-대구지방법원 상주지원 2013.08.27 2013고단115

-대구지방법원 경주지원 2014.04.15 2013고단746

-수원지방법원 2014.10.24 2013고단728