beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.
The District Public Prosecutor's Office of the former District Public Prosecutor's Office of 19 through 33, which has been seized, shall be 2013.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On December 24, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for attempted robbery, etc. at the Daejeon High Court on September 3, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daejeon Prison on September 3, 2012.
In addition, on August 31, 2010, the Daejeon District Court sentenced a fine of 700,000 won for larceny, the Daejeon High Court sentenced the imprisonment of 8 years for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. on May 25, 2001, and on December 1, 199, the Daejeon District Court sentenced the suspended sentence of 1 year for larceny, etc.
【Criminal Facts】
Around June 15:10 on June 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) entered the victim D’s office located in Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, with the entrance door to be opened to the office, and entered the gap of the victim’s surveillance neglected, with the sum of KRW 698,000 in cash owned by the victim, and KRW 50,000 in the market price, and KRW 200,000 in the total market price from May 13, 2013 to May 14, 2013; (b) 1,00 won in books and merchandise coupons; (c) 5 copies in books and merchandise coupons; (d) 1,5,00 won in books and merchandise coupons; and (e) 1, 200,000 won in books and merchandise coupons; and (e) 1, 200,000 won in total from May 14, 2013 to May 17, 2013.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;
1. Statement of each police statement related to D, F and G;
1. A statement prepared by H;
1. Written summary statements of I, J and K preparation;
1. Each report on investigation;
1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, etc. inquiry reports (A), investigation reports (verification of the period of repeated crimes A), and investigation reports (verification of criminal records of a suspect);
1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment;
1. Article 5-4 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 329 and Article 329 of the Criminal Act;