Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
. It is not a working contract but a project contract should be entered into, because it is difficult to provide.
The Defendant’s planning also provides the participants with considerable autonomy in relation to working hours, choice of working places, etc., (ii) the contents of the instant D business, which, in itself, shows that “us is a basic story framework and other Luxembourgs in each country with the fact that “I will work and play on a world, day, day and day at work.”
In relation to the form, “WGM, Luxembourg, necessary female, and stores, etc. shall be delivered to the previous team members of the film production, stores, i.e., personal color coloring, such as ‘G’, ‘WGM, Luxembourg’, ‘WGM, and stores, etc., are respected for those who have newly planned video and flowed into “G” E page, and people having knowledge of the existing gular scale (whether they have made food and drinks, what services are, before the house and park)”, and “bol”, with respect to the bol, “BGM, Luxembourg, and stores, etc., will be respected.”
However, if the face has been a large number;
The number of pages to work is too small.
As such, the whole scams have the honor to be returned wheneverever.
In full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant taken and produced his own creativity and idea with only the Plaintiff’s basic story frame; and (b) the Defendant’s aforementioned production was not simple work but required to have technical skill higher than a certain level; (c) the Defendant taken and edited with his drones, cameras, and Nowon-gu with the technology to perform the above work; and (d) there was no other evidence to deem that the Plaintiff requested a special change or correction work after completion of the production or completion of the instant video production.