The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is a person who supplied construction materials at the construction site of Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, in which E is the owner upon request of D, which is a construction contractor.

On May 19, 2009, the Defendant: (a) at the H Licensed Real Estate Agent Office operated by D in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, for the use of a false lease contract that D does not pay the material price according to the agreement; (b) for the lessor to make a lease contract with D; (c) for the lessor to make the lease contract with D; (d) for the use of the lease contract with the lessor; (d) for the use of the lessor to forge the lease contract under the name of E; and (e) for the use of the name of the lessor in the form of the lease contract stored in the computer, D entered “E”, “I”, etc. in the name column of the lessor in the form of the lease contract stored in the computer; and (e) printed out it; and (e) made D to forge the lease contract under the name of E, which is a private document concerning the rights and duties of

As a result, the Defendant instigated D to forge a private document by forging a pre-use lease contract in the name of E.

B. On October 21, 2009, the Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation document at the Seoul Southern District Court located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, and the above A.

As in the same paragraph, one copy of the forged lease contract was submitted to the public service center of Seoul Southern District Court who is not aware of the fact and exercised it.

C. The Defendant attempted fraud

In applying for a payment order at the time and place stated in paragraph (1), the fact is that there is a material price claim against D, there is no claim against E, and there is no fact that E concluded a lease contract with E, and even though there is no fact that the Defendant paid 59.9 million won of the lease deposit to E, as evidence of a forged lease contract, as stated in paragraph (1), and as if there is a refund claim, he/she attempted to defraud 59.9 million won by deceiving the above court and receiving a favorable judgment. However, E is the wind to comply with this.