logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.01.26 2015고단6170
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 16, 2015, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for habitual larceny at the Daegu District Court on April 16, 2015, and the decision became final and conclusive on April 24, 2015, and is still under suspended sentence.

1. Larceny;

A. On December 7, 2015, the Defendant was parked in the front parking lot in front of the amended company in the Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu, about 01:10, 10-3, 6-1.

C We cut off the lubed knife of the lubed lub vehicle, which was opened by lubing the unfludial knife and brought about the lubity of the vehicle in which the amount owned by the said victim cannot be known.

B. On the same day as the above A 02:10 on the same day, Defendant D owned by the victim D, who was parked in the 7-gil 50-11 Cultural Gondo parking lot at the same 02:0,000, which caused the theft of KRW 2,000 in the street located on the vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victims' property twice.

2. Attempted larceny;

A. On December 11, 2015, the Defendant returned to the alleyway near the Domindong-gu, Daegu Northerndong around 02:00, and on December 11, 2015, the Defendant confirmed that the knife of the doors, such as Gyststa, vehicles, etc., parked at the same place, carried out in order to steal by the same method as that of the above 1. A. However, the Defendant did not commit an attempted crime, even though having confirmed whether the knife was set down on the part of the victim F, who was parked therein.

B. On the same day as the above A, the Defendant confirmed whether the door knife of the victim H-learning vehicle owned by the victim, which was parked in order to steal at the Daegu North-gu, Daegu-gu, 02:30, the 16-gil 24, the Grand River parking lot, as seen above, was broken down, but the Defendant was arrested of the police officer dispatched to the site upon receiving a report from the CCTV control center, and did not commit an attempted act.

Accordingly, the defendant attempted to steal the victims' property twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of D, J and H;

1. Protocols of seizure;

arrow