The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant's act of entering the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below does not constitute a force of interference with business affairs, and even if it constitutes force, it constitutes a legitimate act that does not violate social norms, and thus, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. Thus, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment

2. The court below rejected the defendant's assertion in detail under the title "the judgment on the defendant's assertion" as the grounds for appeal of this case by the defendant, the defendant and the defense counsel of the court below stated the same as the grounds for appeal of this case. In light of the above judgment of the court below compared with the records, the judgment of the court below is just and it is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles as argued by the defendant, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.