logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.04.28 2017고단455
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person without duty who visited the victim C's head office as a customer and has maintained her friendship with him/her.

1. On May 30, 201, the Defendant would pay off the funds to the victim in an apartment building of the victim in Seogu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, with the loans from the victim, “I will pay off the bonds with the money.”

“The purpose is”.

However, not only the defendant did not engage in bond business but also tried to use the money received from the injured party as living expenses, etc., so there was no intention or ability to change it.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received cash 1,100,000 won from the victim, and, from the above date to September 10, 201, acquired the total amount of KRW 6,70,000 through five times, such as the contents in the attached crime sight table 1, from around the above date to September 10, 201.

2. A thief had a cash of KRW 170,00 and a driver’s license, which is owned by the victim in the UAS and the vehicle driving license, at the same place where the victim was living in several days with the consent of the victim on May of the same year, and was stolen by taking advantage of the gap in the location where the victim was locked.

3. The same year for the accused who forges a private document or uses a falsified investigation document;

9.6. Around Busan Gangseo-gu mobile phone sales store: (a) forged a private document in the name of C by stating the fact of forgery in the column of customer who applied for entrance to the mobile phone; and (b) delivered the falsified mobile phone sales application as if the application was duly completed, to employees who are not aware of the forgery.

As can be seen, the Defendant: (a) forged a letter of application for entry by a mobile phone in the name of C, a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of using a mobile phone; and (b) committed an offense list 2. from the above date to April 18, 2012.

arrow