Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. From August 20, 2012 to September 18, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime against Victim C, Victim D, and Victim E, the Defendant stolen a female-use pocket book worth KRW 99,000,000, the market price of the victim C-owned at the president of Hyundai department store 455-21, Gangdong-gu, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, at the first floor agency for the first floor of the modern department store located above the product display stand, and KRW 1,00,000, the market price of the victim D-owned in the product display stand, and KRW 9,00,000, the “BCBG” was stolen.

2. On September 18, 2012, the Defendant: (a) stolen one of the victim’s market prices, which was owned by the victim F, in a multi-purpose store operated by the victim F, on the second floor of the said modern department store, by taking advantage of the gaps in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected; and (b) caused the theft of one room equivalent to KRW 2,60,000, which was owned by the victim.

As above, the Defendant stolen the victims’ property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Each statement of F, C, E, and D;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, was punished by a fine on four occasions due to the same criminal conduct, and on April 26, 2012, the Seoul Northern District Court sentenced the Defendant to six months of the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for larceny at the Seoul Northern District Court (hereinafter “Seoul Northern District Court”) on May 4, 2012, which became final and conclusive and conclusive on May 4, 2012, repeated the instant crime

However, there is a possibility that the defendant suffered from friendly pain, alcohol dependence, etc., and that the defendant has committed the crime of this case with a little impact on the origin of the crime of this case, and the victim F in consultation with the victim F.