logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019. 04. 25. 선고 2019두30997 판결
(심리불속행)상속세 부과제척기간이 경과한 이후 양도소득세 감액을 목적으로 얻은 소급감정가액은 세금 납부목적에 적합한 것이라고 보기 어려움[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2018-Nu-53834 ( December 14, 2018)

Case Number of the previous trial

Examination-transfer-2017-099 (28. 2017.09)

Title

The retroactive appraisal value acquired for the purpose of reduction of capital gains tax after the expiration of the exclusion period for inheritance tax imposition is difficult to deem that it is suitable for the purpose of tax payment.

Summary

(2) The disposition taken by the tax authority excluding the appraisal value acquired through retroactive appraisal for the purpose of reducing the transfer income tax is legitimate, since it is difficult to view the appraisal value acquired through retroactive appraisal after the expiration of the exclusion period of inheritance tax.

Related statutes

Article 97 (1) of the Income Tax Act

Cases

2019Du3097 Revocation of Disposition Rejecting Capital Gains Tax Correction

Plaintiff-Appellant

WonO

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Yongsan Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court on December 14, 2018 2018Nu53834

Imposition of Judgment

April 25, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

While examining the grounds of appeal in comparison with the records of this case and the judgment of the court below, the argument on the grounds of appeal is not deemed to include or not accept the grounds of appeal under the subparagraphs of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow