logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.07.22 2015가단50162
손해배상(자)
Text

1. With respect to traffic accidents listed in the annexed sheet (1), the Plaintiff shall enter into an insurance contract as stated in the annexed sheet (2).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with respect to Crocketing vehicles (hereinafter “Astststru vehicles”), and Defendant A is the owner of the Drar vehicle (hereinafter “Astru vehicle”).

B. On September 27, 2014, around 18:35, 2014, B, while driving a sea vehicle in front of the Yak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stack Stack Stack Stick Stack, the occurrence of an accident that may damage the back wheels of the damaged vehicle due to the collision between the steering part of the damaged vehicle and the back wheels of the damaged vehicle. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. The Defendant A stored the damaged vehicle in Ulsan Factory for the repair of the damaged vehicle until the forest of the damaged vehicle is replaced, and thereafter Defendant A used the damaged vehicle by sirening the damaged vehicle from the Defendant Company from September 29, 2014 to October 29 of the same year.

Then, the Defendant Company asserted to the Plaintiff that Defendant A gave an E E Uddi R8 vehicle siren due to the instant accident, and sought payment of KRW 2,772,00,000 from the rental expense. The Plaintiff filed an application against the Defendants on October 30, 2014.

E. Meanwhile, the terms and conditions of the instant insurance contract stipulate the term of recognition for the lending cost as follows.

Category-IIed District Class 2

3. Loan charges;

(c) Recognition Period (1) Where acceptable: the period until the completion of the repair, but not exceeding 30 days; 10 days

F. After all, on April 21, 2015, the Defendant Company asserted that the instant accident occurred, namely, that Defendant A had a sirenhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3 through 9, 13, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of and limitation on liability for damages;

A. The above facts.

arrow