logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.05.30 2019고단1322
업무방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:00 on April 4, 2019, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol at 7 points of “D’s singing shop” managed by the victim C in Busan Jung-gu, Busan, the Defendant saw the victim as follows: (b) on the ground that the employee did not immediately mislead the service call, and (c) stated that “the Defendant was frighting to the Defendant; (d) he was fright to the Defendant, who was fright to the Defendant; (e) was fright to the Defendant; (e) was fright to the Defendant; and (e) was fright to the other customers who were her corridored, and (e) was fright to the Defendant’s 20 minutes of the disturbance; and (e) was fright to the customers who were her main points.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main management by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment [the determination of a type of punishment] interference with the affairs [the category 1] interference with the affairs [the elements of mitigation]: Reduction area of punishment (including efforts made to recover damage), reduction area [the scope of the recommended area and the recommended punishment] mitigation area, imprisonment with labor for one month to eight months;

2. Circumstances unfavorable to the decision of sentence: The sentence shall be imposed as ordered by taking into account all of the factors of sentencing specified in the arguments in the instant case, including the following circumstances: (a) from around 2016, the defendant was punished for interference with business, obstruction of performance of official duties, violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and damage to property each year; (b) the defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the punishment; (c) the defendant was committed against himself; and (d) the defendant was smoothly agreed with the victim; (d) there was no record of imprisonment or heavier punishment; and (e) the social relation is obvious; and (e) the social relation is clear

arrow