logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.11.23 2016구합84313
요양급여비용환수처분취소 청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The details and details of the disposition are the establishment and operation of the C Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the “instant hospital”).

From April 1, 2011 to November 30, 2012, the Defendant: (a) during the period from April 1, 2011 to November 30, 2012, the Plaintiff received the Plaintiff’s total amount of medical care benefit costs related to self-managed video photographing equipment (hereinafter “Rules on Special Medical Equipment”) in violation of Article 38(1) of the Medical Service Act; (b) in violation of Article 38(1) of the Rules on the Installation and Operation of Special Medical Equipment (hereinafter “Rules on Special Medical Equipment”) and Article 3(1) [Attachment 1] of the National Health Insurance Act (hereinafter “Rules on the Redemption of Medical Care Benefit Costs”) and in violation of Article 8(1) of the Medical Service Act, the Plaintiff did not perform his/her business related to self-managed video photographing equipment (hereinafter “Rules 157, 722, 893, 78(1) of the Medical Care Benefit Costs”).

(3) The Plaintiff’s assertion of the purport of the entire argument by the Plaintiff, as the Plaintiff’s medical specialist in the non-exclusive image department of the instant hospital, on the ground that D violated the operating guidelines of the instant medical equipment, on the ground that D violated the operation guidelines of the instant medical equipment.

arrow