Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 14, 2009, Defendant B was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of breach of trust by the District Court in the Jung-gu District Court on the judgment of October 14, 2009 and completed the execution of the sentence in the medical prison on May 3, 2010.

Criminal facts

1. The defendant A is a person who operates a rice retail business in the trade name of "D", and the defendant B is a person who operates two sources in the trade name of "E".

Even if the Defendants received money from the victims as a source of investment in rice sales business, they did not use it as a source of purchase of rice, and have no choice but to take the method of repaying the principal and profits to the existing investors by using the investment funds attracting junior investors (hereinafter referred to as "defensive money"), and eventually, they would like to receive money from the victims under the pretext of investment by using it as a source of investment funds, even if they receive the investment funds from the victims, because there is extremely weak pecuniary foundation for the repayment of the principal and interest of investment, such as anticipated failure to pay the agreed profits, etc. so long as they do not attract new investors, and even if they do not have any intent or ability to return the investment principal, they would be able to receive the money under the pretext of investment funds.

On July 18, 201, the Defendants conspired with the victim F, and made a false statement to the effect that “B had no intent or ability to pay the agreed profits or return the invested principal to the Defendant H operated by the Defendant B in the Gyeonggi Yang-si, the Defendants purchased 740 rice in a 30-year rice distribution business in the ancient house or in a arche, etc., and then transferred 1,000 won per 1,00 won per frane on a discount set, etc. after purchasing 740 rice in the ancient house or in a arche, etc., and making a false statement to the victim that “B would return the invested principal after paying half of the profit and return the investment principal.”

The defendants deceiving the victim as such and belong to it.