logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.29 2018고단8295
공무집행방해
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 28, 2018, the Seoul Gwanak Police Station D District E, and the Assistant F, etc., sent to the site after receiving 112 reports from the Seoul Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Do Garan Ga, thereby threatening Defendant A, who had the same alcohol as Defendant A, in a knife.

1. On May 28, 2018, Defendant B, at the above 112:15, demanded the police officers, who received the said report, to move to A to the entrance of the bar in order to listen to the Defendant’s statement, which is one of the 112 declarations, in relation to the 112 Report, the Defendant 2: (a) sent the police officers to the entrance of the bar; and (b) assaulted the police officers of the F, who embling the f, by carrying out an anti-end act, such as “Isle, Isle, Isle, Isle,” and boomed the F’s chest on his hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by the police officer.

2. On May 28, 2018, Defendant A, at the entrance stairs of the said danran bar, arrested police officers called out after having received 112 reports as above, as flagrant offender in the crime of assault and returned to the police officer again while traveling patrols, and assaulted F’s chests and face face to stop.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 report F, a police officer, and arrest of flagrant offenders.

3. On May 28, 2018, Defendant C, as indicated in paragraph (2), expressed that the victim F arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender, i.e., the Defendant’s act on the roads of the said entertainment bar and the entertainment bar, and, as indicated in paragraph (2), insulting the victim of the crime by openly insulting the victim, such as “the victim of the victim F, who is the Defendant’s act as a flagrant offender, refers to the victim of the bit of bitch, bitch, bit of bitch, bit of bitch, son, son, son, etc., to the effect that the bitch son, who

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Criminal facts;

arrow