1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the respective entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1, 18, 19, 20, and 21 and all the arguments.

The plaintiff asserted that the notary public based on the loan and the purchase-price claim against E has monetary claims of KRW 8,500,000 based on the notarial deed No. 1146 of 203, No. 1147 of 2003, No. 2906 of 2003, and No. 2908 of 2003, and applied for a payment order with Seoul East East District Court No. 2007Ka6039, Jun. 27, 2007, "E has received 88,50,000 won from July 21, 2007 to the date of full payment of KRW 200 per annum from 150,000 to 150,000 from the date of the above 207-year payment order, and the above 30-year payment order was issued to the plaintiff.

B. On January 6, 2011, in the case of the decision on the cost of execution of the JJ branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the Yongnam branch, E rendered a final decision that the execution cost to be repaid to the Plaintiff was KRW 759,640,00, and ② on January 6, 2011, in the case of the decision on cost of execution of the said Sungnam branch of the J branch of the J branch of the Sungnam branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the Yongnam branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch of the J branch, the execution cost of the instant case was KRW 255,400,000 in terms of the aforementioned expenses, and the amount is borne by E, and the amount is KRW 230,750.