logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.06.05 2016가단4817
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant’s claim and obligation relationship 1) The notary public’s deed of promissory notes prepared by Claw Firm (hereinafter “notarial deeds of each case”) stating that the Plaintiff shall pay the Defendant the amount equivalent to the following:

1) The plaintiff and the defendant agreed on October 11, 200 on April 15, 2003 that D 222,00,000,000 won on April 15, 2003, E 24,000,000 won on May 30, 2003, F 20,000 won on October 11, 2003, F 22,50,000 won on December 31, 2004, and that the principal amount of each of the instant notarial deeds was 8,50,000,000 won on April 30, 200, 200, 205, 2000 won on October 31, 200, 205, 2005.

3) On June 4, 2007, the Defendant filed an application with the Plaintiff for the payment order against the Plaintiff for the payment order of KRW 11,50,000 and damages for delay as Seoul East Eastern District Court Decision 2007Ra5678, and the court issued the payment order on June 13, 2007, and the payment order reached the Plaintiff on July 12, 2007, and was finalized on July 27, 2007. In addition, on June 18, 2007, the Defendant filed an application with the Plaintiff for the payment order against the Plaintiff for the payment of KRW 88,50,000 and damages for delay for the total face value of each of the instant notarial deeds as Seoul East Eastern District Court Decision 207Ra6039, Jun. 27, 2007, the court issued the payment order to the Plaintiff on June 207, 2007, respectively.

B. On May 20, 2009, the Plaintiff and the Defendant divide KRW 40,00,000 to the Defendant for each of the instant notarial deeds and payment orders into four occasions, on May 20, 2009, respectively.

arrow