logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.23 2017가합581994
대여금
Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 2,400,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from September 10, 2008 to March 16, 2018.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

A. Claim No. 2.4 billion won of the outstanding loan amount of KRW 3 billion based on the loan certificate (Evidence No. 1) prepared and delivered by Defendant B to the Plaintiff on August 27, 2008, which was “the borrowed amount of KRW 3 billion and due date September 9, 2008.”

(b) Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts.

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. Basic facts 1) D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”).

A) Around June 30, 2008, Defendant B issued a promissory note as of June 30, 2008 with the Plaintiff, the face value of 3 billion won, the date of issuance, June 30, 2008, and July 25, 2008, and a notary public prepared a notarial deed (Evidence A2) with respect to the said promissory note as of July 29, 2008. (2) around August 27, 2008, Defendant B completely pays 3 billion won until September 12, 2008, and shall be punished by the loan certificate No. 1, and hereinafter “the loan certificate of this case”).

(1) The Plaintiff and Defendant C signed the above loan certificate as a joint and several surety of Defendant B. 【The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

B. On June 30, 2008, the plaintiff asserted 1 of the plaintiff's assertion made a loan of KRW 3 billion to D as of July 25, 2008 with the introduction of the defendant C around June 30, 2008. On or around August 27, 2008, the plaintiff prepared a loan certificate of this case with the defendant B and entered into a novation contract with the purport that the borrower of the above loan is changed to the defendant B and the repayment period is extended to September 9, 2008. The defendant C jointly and severally guaranteed the debt of the loan under the above light agreement with the plaintiff.

Since Defendant B paid only KRW 600 million to the Plaintiff twice and did not pay the remainder of the loan, Defendant C is a joint and several surety obligation, which is the principal obligor.

arrow