The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 23, 2018, the Defendant made a public order for bidding C (hereinafter “instant bidding”).

The method of determining successful bidder was a method of selecting an enterprise which has acquired at least 85 points from technology evaluation as an eligible enterprise in accordance with the criteria for the calculation of the evaluation table of a written request for proposal attached to the notice (hereinafter referred to as the "written request for proposal of this case") through two stages of competition (Simultaneous technical price) tender and determining the minimum price among them as a successful bidder.

(b) The bidder submitted a technical tender (the details of the technical tender are as shown in Attachment 2) along with a technical proposal, including “a detailed subsequent explanation of the support system after the occurrence of emergency medical and security conditions,” and the technology evaluation was conducted with a total of 10 points out of the total of 100 points and a total of 90 points out of the 100 points.

(c)

The Plaintiff participated in the instant bidding, but rejected, and D Co., Ltd (hereinafter “D”) was determined as a successful bidder.

Each evaluation opinion of the Plaintiff and D with respect to the evaluation of legitimacy among the technology evaluation was prepared, and the Plaintiff was subject to a negative evaluation on the operation of the E-Liet (emergency rescue aircraft).

(d)

On August 1, 2019, the Defendant made a disposition rejecting the disclosure of information on the ground that “the technical review table for the instant tender, the company details that the Defendant selected the service company from 1992 to 2018, and the Defendant entered into an actual contract with the service company,” and that “if disclosed the content and evidence of the other proposing company to the outside, it may infringe on the business secrets, etc. of the relevant proposing company” (the Defendant’s disposition rejecting the disclosure of information from the following) was made on the ground that “the assessment opinion about D and all the data submitted by D related to D are disclosed.”

E. In the instant lawsuit, the Defendant shall disclose the grounds for non-disclosure of each information listed in the separate sheet to the public institution.