1. The Defendant’s revocation disposition of each construction permit against the Plaintiffs on May 21, 2015 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff A, B, C, and Nonparty B filed an application with the Defendant for a building permit for the plant-related facilities (satisfies) and the Defendant issued each building permit as follows:

(hereinafter “each building permit of this case”). Plaintiff D acquired the above building permit of this case for E and filed a report on the change of construction participants, and the Defendant accepted it on April 15, 2015.

On April 14, 2015, Plaintiff A (hereinafter “instant land”)’s use of the building site on the date of the building permit (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) and the total floor area of Plaintiff B, on April 14, 2015, 2 Dong plants-related facilities ( stables), 2,885.52 square meters, Plaintiff B, on March 31, 2015, G 4,479.9 square meters (hereinafter “instant two land”) and 3 Dong plants-related facilities ( stables), and 2,537.52 square meters, Plaintiff C on April 14, 2015, H 4,085.3 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and 2,22,340 square meters (hereinafter “the instant land”) and 404 square meters (hereinafter “the instant land”).

B. On May 21, 2015, the Defendant issued a disposition revoking each of the instant building permits for the following reasons.

(hereinafter referred to as the "disposition in this case") - The grounds for the revocation of the building permit (hereinafter referred to as the "disposition in this case") - Even though the area where the construction permit site is not an area in which livestock raising is restricted, most farmers are likely to suffer damage to the quality of agricultural products due to malodor, dust, potass, and chills, etc. caused by the construction of livestock pens as environment-friendly farming methods, which are clean clean areas in which rice farmers have cultivated rice, farm, fry, and water stuffs, etc., under the environment-friendly farming methods. - In addition, it is likely that the clean farmland damage in the relevant area and environment-friendly agricultural infrastructure might collapse as well as the clean farmland

【Ground of recognition” includes a fact that there is no dispute, and where there are evidence Nos. 1 and 2, a number;