1. The Defendant’s KRW 6,254,485 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from May 15, 2012 to February 16, 2016.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with Eul as of February 24, 2012 with respect to the insurance period of the car with the highest running car, and the plaintiff (E) may recognize the fact that the plaintiff suffered injuries, such as Gyeongumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumum, etc., which the plaintiff driven on May 15, 2012 to Busan as of May 15, 2012 (hereinafter "the accident in this case"). Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate for all damages of the plaintiff.

2. Scope of damages.

A. In full view of the purport of the arguments as a result of the physical examination of the F Hospital Head and G Hospital Head of this Court: 4,518,930 won; 1) the rate of loss of labor ability is assessed as 18% (the application of Section II-A-4) under the assumption that the permanent disability caused by the movement restriction or pain in the field of rehabilitation and the surgery is a matter of decision-making after the decision-making on the surgery treatment; 2) the rate of loss of labor ability is assessed as 18% (the application of Section II-A-4) under the evaluation table of loss of labor ability; 3) the rate of loss of labor ability caused by the accident in the case of the Plaintiff is not subject to treatment; 4,518,930 won; 3) the rate of loss of labor ability is not subject to treatment; and 3) the rate of loss of light labor ability is not subject to treatment; 3) the rate of loss of light labor ability under the evaluation table of loss of labor ability; 3-A-a.