logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.15 2016나1204
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the pertinent part of the reasoning of the judgment, and thus, citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this part are as follows. (1) The reasons for this court's explanation are as follows: (2) the defendant's explanation that the plaintiff cannot be deemed to have suffered from the above static harm due to the accident in this case; (3) the result of physical appraisal of the head of the Gyeong National University Hospital (out of time) and the result of inquiry as of October 21, 2014 by the court of first instance, it can be recognized that the above 10 market damages can be recognized after treatment remaining after the completion of treatment of each salt of the accident in this case; (4) the degree of the 10th court's agreement on the 1st court's attached calculation table due to the pelvis 1; (4) the 1st court's explanation on the 10th court's judgment after the 19th court's first instance judgment (out of time before the 10th court's judgment), but the 1st court's explanation on the 14th court's remaining 6th court's oral hearing hearing hearing."

arrow