A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. A crime committed on August 25, 2018;

A. On August 25, 2018, the Defendant infringed on a structure by opening a toilet window that was not corrected at the meeting of the members of the meeting for the operation of the victim, which was located in 07:10,000, and entering the building up to 10,000,000.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as the above paragraph (a), took cash of 2.50,000 won, and stolen it from a credit cooperative that continued to receive the said place.

2. On September 13, 2018, the Defendant attempted to larceny at night buildings: (a) entered a safe, which was located on the reception stand, in order to steal money and valuables, from around 05:40 on September 13, 2018, to remove and remove the window of the toilets not corrected; and (b) did not commit an attempted crime, even if the warning system operates, while leaving the safe, which was on the reception stand, and the police called out.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd a structure at night and attempted to steals another's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police on the police;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of intrusion on a structure, choice of imprisonment), Article 329 of the Criminal Act (a point of Section 1 and choice of imprisonment), Articles 342 and 330 of the Criminal Act (a point of attempted intrusion on a structure at night) concerning criminal facts;

1. The sentencing of Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act that aggravated concurrent crimes is based on comprehensive consideration of the criminal records of the defendant, the criminal records of the reasons for sentencing, the methods and nature of each of the crimes of this case, the degree and nature of the victim, the degree of damage to the victim and whether the victim was recovered, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and the theory of changes, such as the character and conduct of the defendant

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.