1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A’s real estate listed in Appendix 1;

B. Defendant B: The real estate listed in Appendix 2;

(c) the defendant.

1. The fact that Defendant A leased the real estate indicated in attached Form 1 from the Plaintiff, and that, according to Article 9 subparagraph 2 of the lease agreement concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the lease agreement may be terminated in cases where the lease agreement was not paid more than three times. However, the fact that Defendant A did not pay the rent to the Plaintiff for not less than three months does not conflict between the parties, and the fact that the Plaintiff expressed his intention to terminate the lease agreement by delivery of a duplicate of the complaint of this case is significant in this court.

According to the above facts of recognition, it is reasonable to deem that the lease contract concluded between the plaintiff and the defendant A was terminated, and the defendant A has the obligation to deliver the real estate in attached Form 1 to the plaintiff

2. Determination as to each claim against Defendant B, C, D, E, F, and G (hereinafter “Bus Defendants”)

A. The indication of claim: The plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with each other on each real estate stated in the order, and provided that the lease agreement may be terminated if it is not paid more than three times at the time of entering into the lease agreement, and all the remaining Defendants were not paid more than three times.

Since the Plaintiff expressed his intent to terminate the lease contract with the delivery of the duplicate of the complaint of this case, all the remaining Defendants are obligated to deliver each real estate indicated in the disposition to the Plaintiff.

(b) Defendant C, D, F, and G: Judgment by each confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act) by Defendant B, and E: Each service by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act);