logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.08.19 2014고합148
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자강제추행)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant is a person operating E on the third floor of the Goyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City D Building 3, the victim F (hereinafter referred to as 10 years of age), from March 11, 2013, the victim G (hereinafter referred to as 10 years of age) from May 14, 2013, and the victim G from May 14, 2013. The Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victims on five occasions within the “E” from March 2013 to November 13, 2013.

2. Determination

A. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victims as stated in the facts charged.

B. In light of the above, there are statements from the investigative agency of the victims as evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, and H’s expert opinion on child sexual assault case.

According to the above evidence, the victims made a statement that "the victims were engaged in the oral game after the training," and "the victims were frightened on every boat, or who were frighted up to a satisher, by committing an indecent act against the victims coming from the stadium or satising satis," and that "the victims' chests were satisfing with the victim's chest while satisfing with the victim's chests, as the defendant was satisfing in an satisfing manner," the victims G made a statement that the defendant tried to remove the victim from the victim F, and it seems that H, an expert in the child sexual assault case, stated that the victims stated the fact that the victims experienced from the victim F, and there is no reason to make a false statement with regard to the defendant, especially in light of the fact that the victim F was guilty of the facts charged in this case "E" around September 2013.

However, the following circumstances are acknowledged based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court.

arrow