1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the case, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts, so that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the court of first instance. Thus, the contents asserted by the plaintiff in the court of first instance are not significantly different from those asserted by the plaintiff in the court of first instance, and even if all the evidence presented in the court of first instance are examined, it is legitimate to recognize and determine the facts of the court of first instance that rejected such assertion by the plaintiff, even if all the evidence presented in the court of first instance are examined, sees the part to be cited by the court of first instance as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance. [Article 8(2) of the Administrative

Aviation (No. 14 to 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance) is as follows:

(d)

On January 6, 2020, the Plaintiff was indicted for summary facts of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Article 2020 of Seoul Western District Court Decision 2020, 2020) stating that “The Plaintiff caused the instant traffic accident by negligence in the course of its business and thereby escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding and abetting the injured party for about four weeks,” and received a summary order of KRW 5 million from the above court on March 31, 2020, and the said summary order became final and conclusive on April 15, 2020 (hereinafter “related criminal case”). On March 3, 202, the first instance judgment of the first instance court, “the first sentence” of the second sentence is deemed to be “the front bank.”

4 pages 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance is 9: “A person in danger due to the instant traffic accident” as “the person is in danger due to the instant traffic accident.”

From the end of the judgment of the first instance to the end of the 5th page 3, the first instance court will take the following measures:

The Plaintiff was obligated to take appropriate measures, such as aiding the victim, as long as he/she was aware of the occurrence of a traffic accident that causes the shock of the victim and stopped, and as long as he/she did not live in the state of the victim.

However, without providing relief to the injured party, the Plaintiff is involved in the instant traffic accident.