logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2021.01.22 2020누50326
기본재산처분허가신청 불허처분 취소의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which the court should explain concerning this case, is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part to be filled in as follows and the part to be tried in the trial or additionally claimed by the plaintiff, and thus, it shall be accepted pursuant to Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (other matters alleged by the plaintiff in the trial are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the first trial, and even if all the evidence presented in the first trial and the trial are examined, it is legitimate to recognize and determine the facts by the court of first instance that rejected the plaintiff's assertion). [The part to be filled by the court of first instance] The "B" in the first instance judgment of first instance as "B" is changed to "the deceased".

In the first instance judgment, the 3rd to 7th to 10 acts are as follows.

On May 17, 2019, the Plaintiff proposed a "case concerning the disposal of fundamental property (cash) for supporting a newly established social welfare foundation" in a temporary transfer society held on May 17, 2019, and agreed on the total number of 10 persons present among the 11 members of the board of directors to dispose of the bills to support the establishment of a newly established social welfare foundation (cash) under the premise that the competent administrative agency permits the establishment of a new social welfare foundation and legitimate progress. However, the Plaintiff passed a resolution after the permission of the competent administrative agency, legal review, and resolution of

The office of Yeongdeungpo-gu Office in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Yeongdeungpo-gu shall be the office of the first instance judgment of the 3rd 12rd Do and the office of the 12rd Do.

Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance is 14 Myeon 14 Myeon 14 and "a deposit" shall be made.

The judgment of the first instance court was followed by the "J" of the 16th trial and the "J" of the 16th trial and the "new social welfare foundation" of the 4th trial were added, and the 5th trial of the 4th trial "J of the newly established social welfare foundation" and the 4th trial of the 4th trial are deemed to be a "corporation to be newly established".

The 5th 2nd 2nd 2nd 1st son of the judgment of the first instance, "facilities for older persons" shall be raised to "welfare facilities for older persons".

In the first instance judgment, the foundation shall be established from 14 to 15 on the 5 pages of the judgment.

arrow