logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.11.10 2017고정1790
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 26, 2017, at around 15:00, the Defendant’s “F” store operated by the victim E (62 years of age) located in Daegu Dong-gu C, Daegu-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant’s pre-purchaseed the first purchase.

I asserted and argued.

Therefore, the victim is expected to compensate for the value of the goods by returning the value of the goods.

In addition, even though the Defendant requested a conversation from the shop, the Defendant did not comply with this request, the Defendant was able to avoid a disturbance, such as putting about about 30 minutes of the call to the effect that, in the situation where customers are inside the store to commit fraud or are going before the store, they sold the upper limit of 30 minutes of the call.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTVs, such as interference with business affairs, reporting on the occurrence of a suspected incident, reporting on investigation (to make a statement of a witness), reporting on investigation (to make a request for verification ofCCTV), reporting on investigation

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow