The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant dialogues with the husband of the victim on the day of the instant case, but the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case, despite the fact that the victim did not inflict injury on the victim as stated in the facts charged, and rather was unilaterally sought from the victim. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles on self-defense or legitimate act, which affected the conclusion

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the evidence duly adopted and examined. ① The victim stated to the effect that "the victim was found at home of the defendant who was not good in the usual meeting," i.e., "the victim was fighting with flab, etc. with flab, etc. with flabing on the neck and face of the victim, and thereby was damaged by flab, etc." < ② The police officer who received the 112 report was at the time of being dispatched to the scene, was at the top of the victim's timber and flab, etc. (Evidence No. 5, No. 22-23 of the evidence record). ③ Even if there are inconsistent parts with the victim's statement as to whether the defendant used flab, etc., the credibility of the statement that the victim was injured during the process of fighting with one another, ④ the victim's opinion on flab, and the victim's family member did not appear as the victim's husband's flab, and the victim's family member.